Change the error type of the constructors of `Arc` and `UniqueArc` to be
`AllocError` instead of `Error`. This makes the API more clear as to
what can go wrong when calling `try_new` or its variants.

Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>

This function mirrors `UnsafeCell::raw_get`. It avoids creating a
reference and allows solely using raw pointers.
The `pin-init` API will be using this, since uninitialized memory
requires raw pointers.

Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>

This API is used to facilitate safe pinned initialization of structs. It
replaces cumbersome `unsafe` manual initialization with elegant safe macro
invocations.

Due to the size of this change it has been split into six commits:
1. This commit introducing the basic public interface: traits and
   functions to represent and create initializers.
2. Adds the `#[pin_data]`, `pin_init!`, `try_pin_init!`, `init!` and
   `try_init!` macros along with their internal types.
3. Adds the `InPlaceInit` trait that allows using an initializer to create
   an object inside of a `Box<T>` and other smart pointers.
4. Adds the `PinnedDrop` trait and adds macro support for it in
   the `#[pin_data]` macro.
5. Adds the `stack_pin_init!` macro allowing to pin-initialize a struct on
   the stack.
6. Adds the `Zeroable` trait and `init::zeroed` function to initialize
   types that have `0x00` in all bytes as a valid bit pattern.

--

In this section the problem that the new pin-init API solves is outlined.
This message describes the entirety of the API, not just the parts
introduced in this commit. For a more granular explanation and additional
information on pinning and this issue, view [1].

Pinning is Rust's way of enforcing the address stability of a value. When a
value gets pinned it will be impossible for safe code to move it to another
location. This is done by wrapping pointers to said object with `Pin<P>`.
This wrapper prevents safe code from creating mutable references to the
object, preventing mutable access, which is needed to move the value.
`Pin<P>` provides `unsafe` functions to circumvent this and allow
modifications regardless. It is then the programmer's responsibility to
uphold the pinning guarantee.

Many kernel data structures require a stable address, because there are
foreign pointers to them which would get invalidated by moving the
structure. Since these data structures are usually embedded in structs to
use them, this pinning property propagates to the container struct.
Resulting in most structs in both Rust and C code needing to be pinned.

So if we want to have a `mutex` field in a Rust struct, this struct also
needs to be pinned, because a `mutex` contains a `list_head`. Additionally
initializing a `list_head` requires already having the final memory
location available, because it is initialized by pointing it to itself. But
this presents another challenge in Rust: values have to be initialized at
all times. There is the `MaybeUninit<T>` wrapper type, which allows
handling uninitialized memory, but this requires using the `unsafe` raw
pointers and a casting the type to the initialized variant.

This problem gets exacerbated when considering encapsulation and the normal
safety requirements of Rust code. The fields of the Rust `Mutex<T>` should
not be accessible to normal driver code. After all if anyone can modify
the fields, there is no way to ensure the invariants of the `Mutex<T>` are
upheld. But if the fields are inaccessible, then initialization of a
`Mutex<T>` needs to be somehow achieved via a function or a macro. Because
the `Mutex<T>` must be pinned in memory, the function cannot return it by
value. It also cannot allocate a `Box` to put the `Mutex<T>` into, because
that is an unnecessary allocation and indirection which would hurt
performance.

The solution in the rust tree (e.g. this commit: [2]) that is replaced by
this API is to split this function into two parts:

1. A `new` function that returns a partially initialized `Mutex<T>`,
2. An `init` function that requires the `Mutex<T>` to be pinned and that
   fully initializes the `Mutex<T>`.

Both of these functions have to be marked `unsafe`, since a call to `new`
needs to be accompanied with a call to `init`, otherwise using the
`Mutex<T>` could result in UB. And because calling `init` twice also is not
safe. While `Mutex<T>` initialization cannot fail, other structs might
also have to allocate memory, which would result in conditional successful
initialization requiring even more manual accommodation work.

Combine this with the problem of pin-projections -- the way of accessing
fields of a pinned struct -- which also have an `unsafe` API, pinned
initialization is riddled with `unsafe` resulting in very poor ergonomics.
Not only that, but also having to call two functions possibly multiple
lines apart makes it very easy to forget it outright or during refactoring.

Here is an example of the current way of initializing a struct with two
synchronization primitives (see [3] for the full example):

    struct SharedState {
        state_changed: CondVar,
        inner: Mutex<SharedStateInner>,
    }

    impl SharedState {
        fn try_new() -> Result<Arc<Self>> {
            let mut state = Pin::from(UniqueArc::try_new(Self {
                // SAFETY: `condvar_init!` is called below.
                state_changed: unsafe { CondVar::new() },
                // SAFETY: `mutex_init!` is called below.
                inner: unsafe {
                    Mutex::new(SharedStateInner { token_count: 0 })
                },
            })?);

            // SAFETY: `state_changed` is pinned when `state` is.
            let pinned = unsafe {
                state.as_mut().map_unchecked_mut(|s| &mut s.state_changed)
            };
            kernel::condvar_init!(pinned, "SharedState::state_changed");

            // SAFETY: `inner` is pinned when `state` is.
            let pinned = unsafe {
                state.as_mut().map_unchecked_mut(|s| &mut s.inner)
            };
            kernel::mutex_init!(pinned, "SharedState::inner");

            Ok(state.into())
        }
    }

The pin-init API of this patch solves this issue by providing a
comprehensive solution comprised of macros and traits. Here is the example
from above using the pin-init API:

    #[pin_data]
    struct SharedState {
        #[pin]
        state_changed: CondVar,
        #[pin]
        inner: Mutex<SharedStateInner>,
    }

    impl SharedState {
        fn new() -> impl PinInit<Self> {
            pin_init!(Self {
                state_changed <- new_condvar!("SharedState::state_changed"),
                inner <- new_mutex!(
                    SharedStateInner { token_count: 0 },
                    "SharedState::inner",
                ),
            })
        }
    }

Notably the way the macro is used here requires no `unsafe` and thus comes
with the usual Rust promise of safe code not introducing any memory
violations. Additionally it is now up to the caller of `new()` to decide
the memory location of the `SharedState`. They can choose at the moment
`Arc<T>`, `Box<T>` or the stack.

--

The API has the following architecture:
1. Initializer traits `PinInit<T, E>` and `Init<T, E>` that act like
   closures.
2. Macros to create these initializer traits safely.
3. Functions to allow manually writing initializers.

The initializers (an `impl PinInit<T, E>`) receive a raw pointer pointing
to uninitialized memory and their job is to fully initialize a `T` at that
location. If initialization fails, they return an error (`E`) by value.

This way of initializing cannot be safely exposed to the user, since it
relies upon these properties outside of the control of the trait:
- the memory location (slot) needs to be valid memory,
- if initialization fails, the slot should not be read from,
- the value in the slot should be pinned, so it cannot move and the memory
  cannot be deallocated until the value is dropped.

This is why using an initializer is facilitated by another trait that
ensures these requirements.

These initializers can be created manually by just supplying a closure that
fulfills the same safety requirements as `PinInit<T, E>`. But this is an
`unsafe` operation. To allow safe initializer creation, the `pin_init!` is
provided along with three other variants: `try_pin_init!`, `try_init!` and
`init!`. These take a modified struct initializer as a parameter and
generate a closure that initializes the fields in sequence.
The macros take great care in upholding the safety requirements:
- A shadowed struct type is used as the return type of the closure instead
  of `()`. This is to prevent early returns, as these would prevent full
  initialization.
- To ensure every field is only initialized once, a normal struct
  initializer is placed in unreachable code. The type checker will emit
  errors if a field is missing or specified multiple times.
- When initializing a field fails, the whole initializer will fail and
  automatically drop fields that have been initialized earlier.
- Only the correct initializer type is allowed for unpinned fields. You
  cannot use a `impl PinInit<T, E>` to initialize a structurally not pinned
  field.

To ensure the last point, an additional macro `#[pin_data]` is needed. This
macro annotates the struct itself and the user specifies structurally
pinned and not pinned fields.

Because dropping a pinned struct is also not allowed to break the pinning
invariants, another macro attribute `#[pinned_drop]` is needed. This
macro is introduced in a following commit.

These two macros also have mechanisms to ensure the overall safety of the
API. Additionally, they utilize a combined proc-macro, declarative macro
design: first a proc-macro enables the outer attribute syntax `#[...]` and
does some important pre-parsing. Notably this prepares the generics such
that the declarative macro can handle them using token trees. Then the
actual parsing of the structure and the emission of code is handled by a
declarative macro.

For pin-projections the crates `pin-project` [4] and `pin-project-lite` [5]
had been considered, but were ultimately rejected:
- `pin-project` depends on `syn` [6] which is a very big dependency, around
  50k lines of code.
- `pin-project-lite` is a more reasonable 5k lines of code, but contains a
  very complex declarative macro to parse generics. On top of that it
  would require modification that would need to be maintained
  independently.

Link: https://rust-for-linux.com/the-safe-pinned-initialization-problem [1]
Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/tree/0a04dc4ddd671efb87eef54dde0fb38e9074f4be [2]
Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/blob/f509ede33fc10a07eba3da14aa00302bd4b5dddd/samples/rust/rust_miscdev.rs [3]
Link: https://crates.io/crates/pin-project [4]
Link: https://crates.io/crates/pin-project-lite [5]
Link: https://crates.io/crates/syn [6]
Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>

Add the following initializer macros:
- `#[pin_data]` to annotate structurally pinned fields of structs,
  needed for `pin_init!` and `try_pin_init!` to select the correct
  initializer of fields.
- `pin_init!` create a pin-initializer for a struct with the
  `Infallible` error type.
- `try_pin_init!` create a pin-initializer for a struct with a custom
  error type (`kernel::error::Error` is the default).
- `init!` create an in-place-initializer for a struct with the
  `Infallible` error type.
- `try_init!` create an in-place-initializer for a struct with a custom
  error type (`kernel::error::Error` is the default).

Also add their needed internal helper traits and structs.

Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
[ Fixed three typos. ]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>

…ters

The `InPlaceInit` trait that provides two functions, for initializing
using `PinInit<T, E>` and `Init<T>`. It is implemented by `Arc<T>`,
`UniqueArc<T>` and `Box<T>`.

Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>

The `PinnedDrop` trait that facilitates destruction of pinned types.
It has to be implemented via the `#[pinned_drop]` macro, since the
`drop` function should not be called by normal code, only by other
destructors. It also only works on structs that are annotated with
`#[pin_data(PinnedDrop)]`.

Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>

The `stack_pin_init!` macro allows pin-initializing a value on the
stack. It accepts a `impl PinInit<T, E>` to initialize a `T`. It allows
propagating any errors via `?` or handling it normally via `match`.

Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>

Add the `Zeroable` trait which marks types that can be initialized by
writing `0x00` to every byte of the type. Also add the `init::zeroed`
function that creates an initializer for a `Zeroable` type that writes
`0x00` to every byte.

Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>

Add `pin-init` API macros and traits to the prelude.

Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>

This function allows to easily initialize `Opaque` with the pin-init
API. `Opaque::ffi_init` takes a closure and returns a pin-initializer.
This pin-initiailizer calls the given closure with a pointer to the
inner `T`.

Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
[ Fixed typo. ]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>

`UniqueArc::try_new_uninit` calls `Arc::try_new(MaybeUninit::uninit())`.
This results in the uninitialized memory being placed on the stack,
which may be arbitrarily large due to the generic `T` and thus could
cause a stack overflow for large types.

Change the implementation to use the pin-init API which enables in-place
initialization. In particular it avoids having to first construct and
then move the uninitialized memory from the stack into the final location.

Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>

Add two functions `init_with` and `pin_init_with` to
`UniqueArc<MaybeUninit<T>>` to initialize the memory of already allocated
`UniqueArc`s. This is useful when you want to allocate memory check some
condition inside of a context where allocation is forbidden and then
conditionally initialize an object.

Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>

This makes it possible to use `T` as a `impl Init<T, E>` for every error
type `E` instead of just `Infallible`.

Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>

Benno has been involved with the Rust for Linux project for
the better part of a year now. He has been working on solving
the safe pinned initialization problem [1], which resulted in
the pin-init API patch series [2] that allows to reduce the
need for `unsafe` code in the kernel. He is also working on
the field projection RFC for Rust [3] to bring pin-init as
a language feature.

His expertise with the language will be very useful to have
around in the future if Rust grows within the kernel, thus
add him to the `RUST` entry as reviewer.

Link: https://rust-for-linux.com/the-safe-pinned-initialization-problem [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/[email protected]/ [2]
Link: rust-lang/rfcs#3318 [3]
Cc: Benno Lossin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alex Gaynor <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>

It is a wrapper around C's `lock_class_key`, which is used by the
synchronisation primitives that are checked with lockdep. This is in
preparation for introducing Rust abstractions for these primitives.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Cc: Waiman Long <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <[email protected]>
Co-developed-by: Boqun Feng <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>

They are generic Rust implementations of a lock and a lock guard that
contain code that is common to all locks. Different backends will be
introduced in subsequent commits.

Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
[ Fixed typo. ]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>

This is the `struct mutex` lock backend and allows Rust code to use the
kernel mutex idiomatically.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Cc: Waiman Long <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>

This is the `spinlock_t` lock backend and allows Rust code to use the
kernel spinlock idiomatically.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Cc: Waiman Long <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>

This is an owned reference to an object that is always ref-counted. This
is meant to be used in wrappers for C types that have their own ref
counting functions, for example, tasks, files, inodes, dentries, etc.

Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>

It is an abstraction for C's `struct task_struct`. It implements
`AlwaysRefCounted`, so the refcount of the wrapped object is managed
safely on the Rust side.

Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>

This allows Rust code to get a reference to the current task without
having to increment the refcount, but still guaranteeing memory safety.

Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>

This allows us to have data protected by a lock despite not being
wrapped by it. Access is granted by providing evidence that the lock is
held by the caller.

Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>

It releases the lock, executes some function provided by the caller,
then reacquires the lock. This is preparation for the implementation of
condvars, which will sleep after between unlocking and relocking.

We need an explicit `relock` method for primitives like `SpinLock` that
have an irqsave variant: we use the guard state to determine if the lock
was originally acquired with the regular `lock` function or
`lock_irqsave`.

Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/[email protected]/
[ Removed the irqsave bits as discussed. ]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>

This is the traditional condition variable or monitor synchronisation
primitive. It is implemented with C's `wait_queue_head_t`.

It allows users to release a lock and go to sleep while guaranteeing
that notifications won't be missed. This is achieved by enqueuing a wait
entry before releasing the lock.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Cc: Waiman Long <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>

This crate mirrors the `bindings` crate, but will contain only UAPI
bindings. Unlike the bindings crate, drivers may directly use this crate
if they have to interface with userspace.

Initially, just bind the generic ioctl stuff.

In the future, we would also like to add additional checks to ensure
that all types exposed by this crate satisfy UAPI-safety guarantees
(that is, they are safely castable to/from a "bag of bits").

[ Miguel: added support for the `rustdoc` and `rusttest` targets,
  since otherwise they fail, and we want to keep them working. ]

Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Asahi Lina <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>

Add simple 1:1 wrappers of the C ioctl number manipulation functions.
Since these are macros we cannot bindgen them directly, and since they
should be usable in const context we cannot use helper wrappers, so
we'll have to reimplement them in Rust. Thankfully, the C headers do
declare defines for the relevant bitfield positions, so we don't need
to duplicate that.

Signed-off-by: Asahi Lina <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
[ Moved the `#![allow(non_snake_case)]` to the usual place. ]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>

This commit provides the build flags for Rust for AArch64. The core Rust
support already in the kernel does the rest.

The Rust samples have been tested with this commit.

[jcunliffe: Arm specific parts taken from Miguel's upstream tree]

Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
Co-developed-by: Jamie Cunliffe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jamie Cunliffe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>

Enable the PAC ret and BTI options in the Rust build flags to match
the options that are used when building C.

Signed-off-by: Jamie Cunliffe <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <[email protected]>

Disable the neon and fp target features to avoid fp & simd
registers. The use of fp-armv8 will cause a warning from rustc about
an unknown feature that is specified. The target feature is still
passed through to LLVM, this behaviour is documented as part of the
warning. This will be fixed in a future version of the rustc
toolchain.

Signed-off-by: Jamie Cunliffe <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <[email protected]>

This module is intended to contain functions related to kernel
timekeeping and time. Initially, this just wraps ktime_get() and
ktime_get_boottime() and returns them as core::time::Duration instances.

Signed-off-by: Asahi Lina <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Eileen Yoon <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Eileen Yoon <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Eileen Yoon <[email protected]>